| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
381. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Naari Talvanis wrote: Are the fitting slot layouts also known? If we get at least 1 utility high slot it will be hard to dissapoint me.. All ships get the same number of slots. 8 highs full of weapons (nothing stopping you from creating you...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 08:47:00
|
382. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Talos compared to the Thorax with Sisi stats... +1k EHP (welp) +60 Signature Radius +85m/s /w MWD +0.3 seconds align time +1 slot -50m3 Drones This may not end well.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 04:18:00
|
383. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pesky LaRue wrote: Pattern Clarc wrote: Pesky LaRue wrote: Pattern Clarc wrote: Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. if your signature is to be believed (and I have no reason not to), could it be the case that you're taking th...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 03:58:00
|
384. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pesky LaRue wrote: Pattern Clarc wrote: Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. if your signature is to be believed (and I have no reason not to), could it be the case that you're taking this all a bit too personally? would you really ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 03:40:00
|
385. Second pass at 'Tier 3' BC rebalance? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
FYI, they've lost about 250m/s in speed (with MWD acitve)
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 03:31:00
|
386. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
MeBiatch wrote: Pattern Clarc wrote: MeBiatch wrote: hmm so its like a mini mega with 8 nuetrons.... i dont mind that at all tbh... A mega with 1/5 the hp, no drones and 5 low slots? or more a mega and a Hyperion had a baby and this...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 03:05:00
|
387. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
MeBiatch wrote: hmm so its like a mini mega with 8 nuetrons.... i dont mind that at all tbh... A mega with 1/5 the hp, no drones and 5 low slots?
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:51:00
|
388. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Morganta wrote: Pattern Clarc wrote: First of all, the stats are on the public testing server. So, it's pathetic to suggest that we shouldn't offer comment until we see some final sort of state? (How the **** is it suppose to get there in ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:49:00
|
389. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
MeBiatch wrote: so what is the new bonus if not webber? more damage? Tracking.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:46:00
|
390. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Here's the link for the more cultured/seasoned amongst you. http://pastebin.com/wM7eW70C
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:46:00
|
391. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Soldarius wrote: I don't recall reading a post from CCP saying that the tier 3 BC were supposed to be anti-cap ships. While I don't argue that they could certainly be used in that role, I also agree that we should state what we think of the cur...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:28:00
|
392. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Morganta wrote: Pattern Clarc wrote: Morganta wrote: yeah, listen up you pack of amateur professors testing numbers requires actually loading them on the server that is unless you folks think its better for CCP to run the numbers on a p...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:26:00
|
393. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jada Maroo wrote: Pattern Clarc wrote: Jada Maroo wrote: They flat out TOLD you the specs listed were for testing. I know we're not used to beleiving CCP but the ONE thing you can ALWAYS believe them about is when they say something isn't...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:21:00
|
394. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Morganta wrote: yeah, listen up you pack of amateur professors testing numbers requires actually loading them on the server that is unless you folks think its better for CCP to run the numbers on a pad of paper and not an actual game environm...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:19:00
|
395. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jerick Ludhowe wrote: Original stats from sisi dump were beyond broken... Glad to see that the new "dump" has toned these ships down a bit. As far as the Gallente ship not having drones... Wait till the hybrid re-balance is done before you sta...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:08:00
|
396. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jada Maroo wrote: They flat out TOLD you the specs listed were for testing. I know we're not used to beleiving CCP but the ONE thing you can ALWAYS believe them about is when they say something isn't finished. So no one has any issue with the...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:07:00
|
397. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Headerman wrote: jesus they said that it was a first draft too. Stop being teste! I remember similar comments when the t3 subsystems where announced.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:03:00
|
398. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Morganta wrote: IT'S BETA N00B!!!! Maybe if we keep quite and offer no comments/feedback as or when we learn of these things everything will end up perfect in the end?
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:01:00
|
399. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Amro One wrote: Moron, If the last data dump was not public you would not have know about the changes. Moron I would have been as equally baffled by a t1 gallente ship without drones had I never known the original stats.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 02:00:00
|
400. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So according to the latest SISI data dump, all the tier 3 BATTLE CRUISERS lost some speed, HP and had some of their bonuses turned down... Most notable of all was the Talos... Losing it's web bonus AND drones... Either CCP Tallest is preparing o...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 01:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |